Why is there a drop off between undergraduates with STEM degrees and graduates and post docs pursuing careers in the industry. The argument is made that it’s difficult to have more equal representation if more women and minorities don’t pursue those fields. The question always gets asked about why women grow disinterested in STEM fields. By the time she realized there was a serious problem and it wasn’t just her, she was decades into her career. Nancy’s passion for various fields in genetics was clearly more than mine in a different STEM field, and possibly she stuck around longer because she didn’t feel outright mistreated from the very beginning. It only took one semester for me to figure out that my love for computers and programming was not enough for me to put up with the micro aggressions and discrimination I experienced-and I certainly wasn’t willing to do it for the rest of my life. I went into college as a computer science major. I loved computers, and loved my programming classes in high school.
I’d been on computers since I was a child I had a grandfather who worked for IBM. This was two years before I started at college. It might have been a step in the right direction, but it was still only a step in the right direction. The culmination of this novel is in 1999, when Nancy when public with the battle she and other women faced at MIT. How do you decide when you love something so much that you’re willing to put up with things that you shouldn’t have to? How deeply do you have to care about something that it’s worth the stress, anxiety, and disrespect you’re likely to face your entire career? How good do you have to be in your field, how many hours do you have to put in to study and work, just to be tolerated-not respected or even venerated? The story is incredibly compelling and deeply personal-which means that when it was speaking to the barriers these women faced, it made me deeply angry. Zernike does a fantastic job of tracing Nancy Hopkins’ career and that of several of her female peers over the decades as they fought, over and over and over again to be respected for their dedication and contributions in their fields. The Exceptions is a powerful recounting of the uphill battle women have had to face in being treated equally, specifically in higher education at some of the most prestigious universities in the country.
#COMA X ZERNIKE CODE#
As in bestsellers from Hidden Figures to Lab Girl and Code Girls, we are offered a rare glimpse into the world of high-level scientific research and learn about the extraordinary female scientists whose work has been overlooked throughout history, and how these women courageously fought for fair treatment as they struggled to achieve the recognition they rightfully deserve.
#COMA X ZERNIKE PROFESSIONAL#
The Exceptions is a powerful yet all-too-familiar story that will resonate with all professional women who experience what those at MIT called “21st-century discrimination”-a subtle and stubborn bias, often unconscious but still damaging. Meanwhile, men of similar or lesser ability had their career paths paved and widened.
Only when these few women came together after decades of underpayment and the denial of credit, advancement, and equal resources to do their work did they recognize the relentless women were often marginalized and minimized, especially as they grew older. For years they explained away the discrimination they experienced as the exception, not the rule. Hopkins and her peers embarked on their careers believing that discrimination against women was a thing of the past-that science was, at last, a pure meritocracy. Hired to prestigious universities at the dawn of affirmative action efforts in the 1970s, Dr. The Exceptions centers on the life of Nancy Hopkins, a reluctant feminist who became the leader of the sixteen and a hero to two generations of women in science. Written by the journalist who broke the story for The Boston Globe, The Exceptions is the untold story of how sixteen highly accomplished women on the MIT faculty came together to do the work that triggered the historic admission. In 1999, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology admitted to discriminating against women on its faculty, forcing institutions across the country to confront a problem they had long the need for more women at the top levels of science. “Excellent and infuriating.” - Bonnie Garmus (author of Lessons in Chemistry ) for The New York Times From the Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who broke the story, the inspiring account of the sixteen female scientists who forced MIT to publicly admit it had been discriminating against its female faculty for years-sparking a nationwide reckoning with the pervasive sexism in science.
0 kommentar(er)
